Skip to content

Conversation

@shenxianpeng
Copy link
Collaborator

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng commented Oct 30, 2025

Fix potential issue cpp-linter/cpp-linter-action#364 (comment)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated dependency configuration to require pip >= 20.3 (added a clarifying inline comment).

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 30, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.44%. Comparing base (7332611) to head (0fc6dd4).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #137   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.44%   94.44%           
=======================================
  Files           4        4           
  Lines         108      108           
=======================================
  Hits          102      102           
  Misses          6        6           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 30, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #137 will not alter performance

Comparing shenxianpeng-patch-1 (0fc6dd4) with main (c1d5f09)1

Summary

✅ 60 untouched
⏩ 13 skipped2

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (7332611) during the generation of this report, so c1d5f09 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

  2. 13 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2025 16:46
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Walkthrough

Added a requirement for pip>=20.3 to pyproject.toml dependencies with an inline clarifying comment; no other dependency changes or deletions were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Dependency Management
pyproject.toml
Added pip>=20.3 to the dependencies section with an inline clarifying comment.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Single-file, cosmetic dependency addition with no code or behavioral changes
  • Review focus: validate the intended placement/syntax in pyproject.toml and confirm the inline comment formatting is acceptable for tooling/parser compatibility

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "fix: update pyproject.toml dependency to add pip" directly and clearly describes the main change in the pull request. The raw summary confirms that the changeset adds "pip>=20.3" to the dependencies section of pyproject.toml, which matches exactly what the title conveys. The title is specific about the file being modified, the action being performed, and the dependency being added. It is concise, readable, and avoids vague terminology, making it easy for teammates to understand the primary change when scanning the PR history.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch shenxianpeng-patch-1

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9d95c22 and 0fc6dd4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pyproject.toml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Run benchmarks

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng merged commit 8d893fa into main Oct 30, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng deleted the shenxianpeng-patch-1 branch October 30, 2025 17:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants